So, from: Gill, B., English, B., Furgeson, J., & McCullough, M. (2014). Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Profiles of early-adoption districts. (REL 2014-016). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs:
SLOs can be used for teacher evaluation in any grade or subject, but require substantial effort by teachers and principals, and ensuring consistency is challenging [emphasis added].
Use of alternative growth measures that do not depend on state assessments is recent, and little is known about their validity and reliability [emphasis added] or about how they are being used.I have subtly raised concerns about the reliability of our SLOs - it is assumed that the teacher will provide a substantial performance task(s) (based on the end of the year expectations) that will show student growth, but because of time limitations, lack of preparation, lack of knowledge, etc., it is conceivable that it may not have happened - it is an unknown variable. Thus, to me, the reliability of our SLOs is in question....
I have an excellent article, but it is in my TKES/TAPS notebook at school; I'll bring it home and give you the information soon. The researchers show that SLOs really shouldn't be used in teacher evaluations at all.... It is from the same research institute.
If you have comments or questions, let me know.... gcason123@gmail.com; online portfolio is: https://sites.google.com/site/gcason123/
No comments:
Post a Comment