Showing posts with label TKES. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TKES. Show all posts

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Read this: Practical ideas to implement and demonstrate the 10 Standards

Notebooks are worthwhile to organize your documentation (I've posted about that previously).  We have a school-wide Resource Notebook (communication, meetings, etc.), Curriculum Notebook (lesson plans, assessments, etc.), and a Professional Development folder (that now gives me a total of 4 notebooks and 1 folder).  But, as a reminder, you can't document your way to a 4 rating.  We use e-mail, web sites, and Remind among other means to aid in communicating with parents.  The detailed ideas listed below for the Standards are slightly edited from a colleague of mine (she gave me permission).  Read it slowly, apply it lavishly.  You should revise your lesson plan to include all of the elements listed under Standard 2 below.  Hope this information helps.  

Standard 1: Professional Knowledge
This standard focuses on your content knowledge, pedagogical skills and the extent to which you facilitate relevant learning experiences. Professional Knowledge can be gleaned from your lesson plans, but is primarily observable through instruction.

Standard 2: Instructional Planning
This standard is all about INTENTIONAL planning. The emphasis is on planning standards-based lessons, incorporating strategies to engage students and using data to address students’ differentiated learning needs.

You should have your curriculum resource notebook available for your evaluator to see your plans and student data.  Current (as well as previous lesson plans) should be in your curriculum resource notebook.

Lesson Plans should include:
  • Standard(s)/Topic(s) and Essential Question(s)
  • Vocabulary
  • Opening, work session, and closing.
  • Instructional strategies to engage students in active learning
  • Reference what data is being used and how it is being used to address students’ differentiated learning needs.
  • Plans to differentiate instruction and/or assessment based on students’ needs.
  • Assessment strategies (informal, formative, summative)
  • Consider how you are planning for higher order questions as well – these have to be intentionally planned. It helps to be specific because that is when they are used the most and relevant to the instruction.
Standard 3: Instructional Strategies
Student engagement & active learning are the keys to this standard and should be observable during the observation. Also, lesson plans should indicate that you are using a variety of instructional strategies to engage students and facilitate active learning.
Standard 4:  Differentiated Instruction
This standard focuses on the extent to which you incorporate remediation and acceleration (based on data) to address students' learning needs and readiness. Your lesson plans should include how you are differentiating as well as the data used and how it was used to differentiate. Remember: Differentiation can be by content, process, product, or learning environment. 
Standard 5: Assessment Strategies
This standard focuses on the extent to which you are assessing students -- diagnostic, informal, formal, formative, summative and whether the assessments are appropriate for the content and student population. During the observation, ongoing informal assessment is observable through questioning and other means through which you determine if students are understanding the material. Your assessment strategies should also be listed in your lesson plans.
Standard 6: Assessment Uses
This area supports differentiated instructional practices and specifically, how you are using assessment data to meet students' learning needs. The Evaluator will look at how you gather, analyze, and use data to inform instructional decisions. This standard also incorporates providing timely and constructive feedback to parents and students.

Standard 7: Positive Learning Environment
The keys to Standard 7 are rituals, routines, and procedures, which are the foundation of a well-managed, safe and orderly learning environment. In addition to rituals and routines, this standard is observable through positive interactions and mutual respect between teacher(s) and students as well as among students.
  
Standard 8: Academically Challenging Environment
This standard looks at the extent to which the learning environment is student centered, students are being challenged (for their level of readiness) and are self-directed, productive learners, all of which are observed during the observation.
Standard 9: Professionalism
This standard focuses on the extent to which you are following established local, state, and federal practices, participating in professional learning, working well with your colleagues, meeting deadlines and generally performing your duties as expected. This standard is observable through your participation in professional learning, collaborative planning, and activities beyond the classroom. Good sources of documentation would be to make sure the collaboration and meeting forms are being completed and placed in your resource binder and that you are participating in professional growth opportunities to support student learning.
Standard 10: Communication
The standard focuses on how you communicate with parents, students, colleagues and other stakeholders to support student learning.  Information to parents should go out once a week and email should be checked daily. All other communication like phone calls should be organized in your communication binder. Communication is observable through the documentation in addition to ongoing observation of  your fact-to-face interactions with students, parents and colleagues, etc.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Legislative voting record to create TKES and SLO

TKES (and the Student Learning Objective multi-measure assessment--SLO) was created through HB 244 which passed in 2013 and became law in 2014.  You can find the actual bill HERE, but also you can find the voting record for each of the House of Representatives and Senators half way down the page under the link for "Votes."  As a point of information, the link shows---Senators: Yes, 52; No, 0.  House: Yes, 151; No, 21.

http://www.legis.ga.gov/Legislation/en-US/display/20132014/HB/244

Saturday, February 14, 2015

In: Georgia Milestones (standardized test)---Out: CRCT---In: TKES---Out: Standardized Tests for Evaluating Teacher's Effectiveness for Student Achievement

The use of the standardized test that was to judge Georgia teachers' effectiveness on student achievement and therefore contribute significantly to the calculation for the Teacher Keys Effectiveness System, and ultimately the teachers' annual TEM score, is on hold - at least for one year.

Look at the article reporting on the State School Superintendent's thoughts here: AJC
Testing: Saying there is an overemphasis on test scores, Woods added, “We must aggressively lessen this burden.” He also wants a longer moratorium on using scores from the new Georgia Milestones k-12 tests, which roll out this year, to retain children or evaluate effective teaching. 
We were also presented with this update at our school.

(Sorry for the educational alphabet soup, but...)  
As I understand it; start out: Annual TEM score for teachers calculated through the TKES process which is composed of three parts: 1) calculations of student achievement gains determined through teacher-generated SLOs or standardized test results, 2) teachers receiving scores (1-4) on the 10 Standards and 72 Elements outlined in TAPS, and 3) student survey results.

Not even 12 months into the system, currently: 1) student achievement gains from SLOs thrown out [research indicates SLOs can be considered neither valid or reliable], 2) student achievement gains from standardized tests thrown out [my understanding: GA Milestone tests have not even been field tested for validity and reliability].  I would not be surprised if the TEM is thrown out before the end of the school year; that would leave TAPS and the student survey results.  I'd vote for keeping the TAPS only....

Friday, January 9, 2015

Expected legislation

A friend sent me this information.  The highlighted areas are from the e-mail to indicate which items are concerned with education.
There are lots of other bills that are expected to be introduced.  Here are some of the more talked about proposals.
  1. Gun Bill—gun advocates still want the opportunity to carry guns everywhere including college campuses.  Having seen some of the officiating calls in college football games this year, if this bill passes football officials may have to wear bullet proof vests!  It is anticipated that HB 826 will be reintroduced and gives school systems more flexibility in dealing with weapons that are not used in a threatening manner.
  2. Expect some changes to TKES and LKES.   Legislators on the education committees heard an ear full at the listening sessions around the state.
  3. Education Committee members are committed to changing the Status Quo option that systems have as a choice effective July 1, 2015.  The SBOE is already making changes to the IE2 and Charter System options via rule changes.
  4. PBIS is gaining wide support throughout the state and you can anticipate that it will be funded at a higher level this year.
  5. Many legislators are tired of hearing complaints about integrated math and you can anticipate that there will legislation aimed at returning us to discrete math whether or not the SBOE changes the rule.
  6. One bill that will receive significant attention will be introduced by Rep. Mike Dudgeon of Johns Creek.  Rep. Dudgeon has announced that he will introduce a constitutional amendment that will call for the election of the State School Board by congressional district with the elected school board given the responsibility to appoint the State School Superintendent.  Constitutional amendment legislation if passed will not appear on the ballot until November 2016.
  7. The Governor will appoint a commission to study the funding formula for education.  (Purdue did the same, they studied it for five years and all they came up with is IE2.)  It will be an arduous task to replaced QBE and maintain equity and fairness.  This one could get tricky!
  8. Hopefully Common Core is an over and done issue.  The listening sessions, surveys, and defeat of Tea Party challengers should put an end to the common core challenges.

Monday, December 8, 2014

Zero TKES/TAPS Stress Now...

I must say, that after realizing how I could document and pass all 10 standards on a day where I was not even teaching has been very liberating.  I am not going to upload any more documents into The Platform.  I am not going to save copies of any more grade reports or data samples.  I am not going to update my notebooks.  I am not going to worry about any more evidence.

If you have not seen the blog post, handbook, or PowerPoint on what I did, I recommend you take a few minutes to view it--it will save you time.

I incorporated the lesson plan from my doctoral study (Doctoral Study Lesson Plan) with the TAPS Standards and Elements and made notations in my lesson for the Evaluator on how I was meeting each Standard that day.  I think it is comprehensive and convincing.  A friend of mine, who hopes to be a principal soon, said that s/he would use it to help prepare his/her teachers for TKES.

The handbook and PowerPoint can both be found on my website on this page: GC-District Walkthrough-PPT.  I prefer the PowerPoint for viewing...

Respectfully,
Glenn

Thursday, December 4, 2014

TKES Conversation-January 2015

If you are going to the Georgia Music Educator's Association state convention in Savannah January 29-31, why not stop by have a conversation, share ideas, and discuss TKES?  I'll be at the poster session presenting the results of my doctoral study: "Activating Prior Knowledge with Ques and Questions as a Key Instructional Strategy to Increase Student Achievement in Low Socioeconomic Middle Schools."  The result was a lesson plan introduction that dramatically increased students' achievement compared to the teachers who did not use the lesson plan.
Using archival data, this ex post facto study found a statistically significant difference using an ANCOVA, F(1, 863) = 35.398, < .000, for the research question investigating the effect on student achievement when teachers specifically activate students’ prior knowledge before using the LFS model of instruction.
The lesson plan from my doctoral study is used in my TKES lesson as well.

I will have copies of my "Saxophone Handbook" for you to review, "How to pass all 10 TAPS in one lesson," and other items that could assist you in a) teaching, b) TKES, c) saxophone instruction, or d) lesson plans.  All of the information is free.

I will be performing at the Friday night concert as well; it should be a good program of music.

Hope to see you there.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

How to pass all 10 TAPS in One Lesson

Refer to this link on my website and view the "GC-Demonstrating all 10 TAPS.pdf" handbook.  It is a summary of the ideas written in this blog dated 11-16-14.

The handbook could be titled: How to demonstrate all 10 TAPS in a single lesson without using further evidence.  See what you think....

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Effective teachers, effective strategies, and effective assessments may not get noticed through TKES/TAPS evaluation

There are 2 elements to this post: actual effective teaching through effective instructional strategies and assessments, and documenting effective teaching through effective instructional strategies and assessments for TKES/TAPS.

Actual Effective Teaching: The result of my doctoral study was a research based lesson plan design that was flexible for all subjects, all grade levels, and would help the teacher offset some of the effects of low-socioeconomic situations on middle school students’ learning.  It is a very simple design, and it works.  You can view it here: https://sites.google.com/site/gcason123/lesson-plan-design   Briefly:
Relevant Literature:  As the research base increases, there is an emerging picture suggesting that low-SES factors do affect student achievement, students from low-SES environments are likely to have less prior knowledge than their higher-SES peers do, and prior knowledge is a critical variable for learning new content (Barton & Coley, 2009; Planty et al., 2009; Stewart, 2008; Wyner et al., 2008) .  Past researchers have shown that an effective classroom teacher can offset some of the low-SES effects [emphasis added] (American Psychological Association, 2008; Brown, Anfara, & Roney, 2004; Marzano, 2000, 2003; Marzano et al., 2000; Williams, Kirst, & Haertel, 2005). As Marzano (1998) pointed out, there is a relationship between APK and increasing student achievement for low-SES students [emphasis added]. Marzano (2003) also noted that effective teachers increase student achievement approximately 50 percentage points in 1 school year….  Goodwin (2010) noted that the difference in student achievement in a single school year from a highly effective teacher could be a gain as much as a year and a half  [emphasis added] versus a highly ineffective teacher who could increase student achievement a little as one half year—a potential difference in student achievement of an entire school year.
Results:  (Simply put, the students in the classroom whose teacher APK scored 5 points higher than the other classes with a 99.99% certainty.)  The classes where teachers APK had a statistically significant greater increase in achievement, controlling for the pretest and grade-level effect as indicated by their standardized posttest scores, F(1, 863) = 35.398, p < .000, than the students whose teachers did not APK and only used LFS.  The critical region for the F ratio was 3.86, α = 0.05.

Here are the elements that need to be in the lesson (note that every element is the summation of high quality research findings): 
Assumptions: Expectations must be clear to the teacher and clearly and directly communicated to the students.  Learning goals (concepts, skills, and/or relationships) must be specific and directly linked to prior knowledge.  Students’ prior knowledge must be activated before proceeding with the instructional component.  Explicit classroom behavior, participation, and outcome results must be clear to the teacher, and explicitly and directly communicated to the students.  Identifying similarities, differences, and relationships for new content and as they relate to prior knowledge is the strongest instructional strategy.  Practice/homework provides self-pacing and exploring required concepts and skills.
Components: specific curriculum standard, specific learning goal, specific learning activities, general and specific prior standards, specifically activating prior knowledge, essential question, specific explicit directions, specific learning activity structure (beginning, middle, end), specifically identify similarities, differences, and relationships; specific practice opportunities; specific directions for orderly classroom.
Why do I bring that to your attention?  To demonstrate the absurdity of what a teacher might have to do to document effective teaching for Evaluators, Observers, and Teachers in the TKES/TAPS walkthroughs.

Our school had a district walkthrough this past week.  Principals, TKES Evaluators, Assistant Principals, and the like, walked our hallways, went into classrooms with their clip boards, took notes, and had meetings to provide a “snap shot” of the quality and effectiveness of our school.  In the end, they provided a list of areas that were “glow” and areas of “grow.”

Documenting Effective Teaching: The following sample is what I wrote on the board for the day’s lesson.  I literally read every Standard and Element and typed out how/if it applied to the lesson that day.  Simply put, the students had their weekly Thursday playing test.  Because the students know how the procedure works, I normally would write on the board, “TEST: #49.”  But for those who are not familiar with my procedures, subject matter, and instructional techniques, I wrote it all out so that I would get “credit” for meeting the Standards, Elements, and being a good teacher for our school (obviously, there is more to being a good teacher than just this….)
Go straight to your instrument, straight to you chair, and prepare for your playing test.  You may warm up on your own.
1.      Today you will be demonstrating your prior knowledge of Standards 2 and 7 through individual playing in a formal summative test.  Sixth grade will play the first four measures of #49 (you want to demonstrate mastery of notes), and the seventh and eighth graders will play #82 without the repeat (you want to demonstrate mastery of rhythm).
2.      You all need to have a pencil and paper.  You will grade each other, make a brief note as to what needs improvement, and compare your grade with what I give them.  You may not talk during the test.
3.      Grade yourself as well; if you do not like your grade, practice at home some more, and you play it again for a higher score.
4.      To give the best, accurate grade, identify similarities and differences in what you see on the page and what you hear.  Ask, “How does what I hear compare with what I see?”
Prior knowledge to be graded:
Posture, embouchure, tonguing, fingerings, rhythmic understanding, articulation, tone, air speed, rhythmic accuracy, key signatures, steady beat, counting, time signature, evaluating musical performances, listing strength and weakness of performances, and effectiveness of performances
These exercises will be used to develop your skill for the concert December 18 in the gym at 7pm.  We’ve prepared for this test through a series of similar exercises in the book, so I expect you all to make at least an A—probably a 100.  If you want to take a risk, you can play the exercise (correctly) from memory, I can give you 5 points extra credit.  If we have time, we will work on concert music.

If you are familiar with the TAPS standards, you probably see the Standards and Elements in the lesson; you may have seen how I incorporated findings from my doctoral study.  However, to itemize, here is what each statement addresses—in my estimation:

Go straight to your instrument, straight to you chair, and prepare for your playing test [2.6, 7.2, 8.1, 10.4, 10.5, explicit behavior expectations and orderly classroom].  You may warm up on your own [10.5, specific opening of class, activating prior knowledge; differentiation of process, specific practice opportunities].

1.      Today you will be demonstrating your prior knowledge [specific learning goal] of Standards 2 and 7 [1.1, 2.5, explicit curriculum standard] through individual playing [3.4, 5.6, specific learning activity] in a formal summative test [5.1, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.2, 9.1, 10.5, learning goal is clear to the teacher; explicit directions communicated to students]Sixth grade will play the first four measures of #49 [5.1, 5.3, 10.5] (you want to demonstrate mastery of notes) [explicit outcome], and the seventh and eighth graders will play #82 without the repeat [5.1, 5.3, 10.5] (you want to demonstrate mastery of rhythm) [1.4, 1.5, explicit outcome].
2.      You all need to have a pencil and paper [7.2, 10.5].  You will grade each other [explicit participation], make a brief note as to what needs improvement [8.2, 10.1, explicit participation], and compare your grade with what I give them [1.7, 3.1, 6.5, 6.6, 7.2, 7.4, 8.3, 10.1, 10.5, explicit participation, specific learning activity].  You may not talk during the test [7.2, 10.5, explicit participation and orderly classroom].
3.      Grade yourself as well [5.2, 6.7, 7.2, 10.5, explicit participation]; if you do not like your grade, practice at home some more [practice/homework], and you play it again for a higher score [6.7, 8.2, 10.5].
4.      To give the best, accurate grade [6.7], identify similarities and differences in what you see on the page and what you hear [10.5, 6.7].  Ask, “How does what I hear compare with what I see?”  [1.2, 4.5, 6.5, 6.7, identify similarities and differences, specific learning activity]

Prior knowledge to be graded: [2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 6.7, 8.6, learning goal specifically and directly linked to prior knowledge]
Posture, embouchure, tonguing, fingerings, rhythmic understanding, articulation, tone, air speed, rhythmic accuracy, key signatures, steady beat, counting, time signature, evaluating musical performances, listing strength and weakness of performances, and effectiveness of performances

These exercises will be used to develop your skill [1.4, 2.3] for the concert December 18 in the gym at 7pm [1.3, 3.8, 6.4].  We’ve prepared for this test through a series of similar exercises in the book [2.2, 2.3, 3.2, learning goal specifically and directly linked to prior knowledge, general prior standards], so I expect you all to make at least an A—probably a 100 [1.6, 4.6, 5.5, 8.5].  If you want to take a risk, you can play the exercise (correctly) from memory [10.5], I can give you 5 points extra credit [1.6, 2.1, 4.1, 4.2, 4.6, 5.2, 5.6, 7.2, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7].  If we have time, we will work on concert music [2.3].

The point?  I make an effort to be a highly effective teacher through research based instructional strategies, techniques, lesson plan design, assessments, paying close attention to the engagement and understanding of my students (formative assessments) etc. on a daily basis,  But, if I were to put “TEST: #49” on the board and proceeded with the test in the manner I did, I would probably have failed the observation walkthrough for that day (and received a “grow”) because the Evaluator/Observers did not understand the depth of what was actually going on.  My attention to detail is driven by the number of 2s given out to teachers, and the vast differences in Observer's and Evaluator’s recording of minutia (to the teacher’s detriment) or omission of details (also to the teacher’s detriment).  It appears that if the teacher does not make everything explicit, it may get overlooked.

I am planning on creating a detailed description (such as the first example above) to go on the board for each walkthrough and observation—especially when the Evaluator is looking for all 10 Standards in a single lesson.  I probably will label the statements with each Standard and Element (such as the second example) and give a copy to the Evaluator when they enter the room.

Monday, September 1, 2014

Further information to assist you....

Apart from this ongoing blog presentation of descriptions and ideas, I wanted to point to you a series of handouts that may be helpful.  They're located on this blog, in part, and on my online portfolio (https://sites.google.com/site/gcason123/).  Brief descriptions:

Advice and Teaching Methods:
Sight Reading at Concert Festival (a.k.a. LGPE: Large Group Performance Evaluation)
Saxophone Handbook (comprehensive manual for teaching/playing saxophone)

Some ideas for new teachers....
Some teaching ideas....
Some procedural ideas....
Some ideas for question....
Some "behavior modification" (i.e., discipline) ideas....
Some physical management ideas....

Surviving a Doctorate: Year 1.  Practical advice on ideas and methods to make sure you finish your degree!

Handbooks and Other Resources:
Classroom Instruction That Works, 2nd ed. Results (very good)
Instructional Strategies That Work (very good)
Saxophone Handbook
Surviving a Doctorate: Year 1

TKES-Specific Ideas and Essays:
TKES: Lesson Plan Design
TKES: Checks for Understanding
TKES: Differentiation
TKES: Mastering Concepts and Skills
TKES: Remediation and Enrichment
TKES: Keys to Your Successful Evaluation
TKES: Lesson Plan Design for Band

School Law:
Thoughts & Quotes Regarding "A Teacher's Pocket Guide to School Law" (very good refresher)

Instructional Strategies:
Instructional Strategies That Work
The 9 Most Effective Instructional Strategies That Work--Updated

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

This is important, but it won't matter...

If you have read the previous blogs, you should notice that there are practical, real concerns in developing and administering the S.L.O.s (student learning objectives) as part of the new Georgia TKES (Teacher Keys Effectiveness System).  If you haven't read them, please take a moment to do that now....  I'll wait....  Researchers have now compiled evidence that should be taken notice by those in charge (although it is too late for that).  The following statements are from a recent article released by the IES (Institute of Education Sciences); if you haven't signed up for their automatic e-mail notices, you should - it's good stuff - it's the real deal.  I have put a copy of this article in my TKES/TAPS notebook (a picture of my notebook can be seen in a previous blog).

So, from: Gill, B., English, B., Furgeson, J., & McCullough, M. (2014).  Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Profiles of early-adoption districts.  (REL 2014-016).  Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic.  Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs:
SLOs can be used for teacher evaluation in any grade or subject, but require substantial effort by teachers and principals, and ensuring consistency is challenging [emphasis added].
Use of alternative growth measures that do not depend on state assessments is recent, and little is known about their validity and reliability [emphasis added] or about how they are being used. 
I have subtly raised concerns about the reliability of our SLOs - it is assumed that the teacher will provide a substantial performance task(s) (based on the end of the year expectations) that will show student growth, but because of time limitations, lack of preparation, lack of knowledge, etc., it is conceivable that it may not have happened - it is an unknown variable.  Thus, to me, the reliability of our SLOs is in question....

I have an excellent article, but it is in my TKES/TAPS notebook at school; I'll bring it home and give you the information soon.  The researchers show that SLOs really shouldn't be used in teacher evaluations at all....  It is from the same research institute.

If you have comments or questions, let me know....  gcason123@gmail.com; online portfolio is: https://sites.google.com/site/gcason123/

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards & Documenting Performance

Georgia Department of Education. (2014). Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Handbook.  Atlanta:  Retrieved from http://legisweb.state.wy.us/InterimCommittee/2012/TKESHandbook.pdf
“All Rights Reserved”

p. 8
Distinguishing Characteristics of the Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards
The TAPS component has several distinctive characteristics. It provides:
  • A focus on the relationship between professional performance and improved learner academic achievement.
  • Sample performance indicators for each of the teacher performance standards.
  • A system for documenting teacher performance based on multiple data sources.
  • A procedure for conducting performance reviews that stresses accountability, promotes professional improvement, and increases the involvement of teachers in the evaluation process.

p. 11

Performance indicators provide examples of observable, tangible behaviors for each standard as noted in Appendix 1. That is, the performance indicators are examples of the types of performance that may occur if a standard is being successfully met. The list of performance indicators is not exhaustive, is not intended to be prescriptive, and is not intended to be a checklist. Further, all teachers are not expected to demonstrate each performance indicator. [emphasis in original]

p. 16
Step 4: Documenting Performance
Explanation
A fair and equitable performance evaluation system for an educational professional acknowledges the complexities of the job. Thus, multiple data sources are necessary to provide a comprehensive and authentic “performance portrait” of a teacher’s work.  The Teacher Keys Effectiveness System takes into account several data sources. The TAPS focuses on two data sources, in particular - observation and documentation.

Observations
Classroom observations provide key information on the performance standards. Credentialed evaluators are required to conduct two formative observations. These observations may be announced or unannounced and must be at least 30 minutes in duration. In addition, a minimum of four walkthroughs/frequent brief observations consisting of at least 10 minutes each should be conducted for each teacher. Additional observations may be conducted at the building administrator’s discretion. All observation feedback will be recorded using the GaDOE TLE Electronic Platform.

To assist evaluators, a TAPS Reference Sheet that lists the performance standards and sample performance indicators is provided in Appendix 2. Evaluators should keep in mind that the indicators are merely examples of the behaviors teachers might display if they are proficient in the standards. The indicators are not to be used as a checklist. [emphasis in original]  Evaluators are required to keep their observation notes pertaining to various standards on the Formative Assessment Report Form, making sure to annotate (check box) that the comments pertain to the observation. When it is time to make summative ratings of performance, evaluators should not assign ratings to the ten standards based solely on the observations.

Evaluators will conduct a pre-evaluation conference, mid-year conference and summative evaluation conference for all teachers evaluated by the TKES. The evaluator is also responsible for providing timely feedback to the teacher regarding the Formative Assessment Report Form through the GaDOE TLE Electronic Platform. Although feedback is required, a formal  conference after each formative observation is optional.

Monday, July 21, 2014

Welcome!

A friend and colleague of mine has read some of my writings and "handbooks" I've prepared for the TKES evaluation in our county.  She suggested that I create a blog and post some of the items I've written as well as creating a space for others to give/receive feedback/advice.  So, here it is.  I've never done this before, but am willing to take a step.

Here are some links to essays and ideas I've had in regard to TKES.  Please feel free to look at them and let me know if they are helpful, you need other resources, etc.

Respectfully,
Dr. M. Glenn Cason
Dr. Cason's Online Portfolio

Instructional Strategies
Instructional Strategies That Work


Advice and Teaching Methods


Selected School Law Topics
Thoughts & Quotes Regarding "A Teacher's Pocket Guide to School Law"


TKES
TKES: Lesson Plan Design
TKES: Checks for Understanding
TKES: Differentiation
TKES: Mastering Concepts and Skills
TKES: Remediation and Enrichment
TKES: Keys to Your Successful Evaluation
TKES: Lesson Plan Design for Band


Handbooks and Other Resources
Classroom Instruction That Works, 2nd ed. Results
Instructional Strategies That Work
Saxophone Handbook
Surviving a Doctorate: Year 1